The Tyranny of Israel and the Jews - Everyone Must Eat Bagels!

Our favorite psychopath, the new millenium's Hitler, President Ahamadinejad, is at it again. (By the way, is it just me or does Ahamadinejad's name bear at least a slight resemblance to the guy from Office Space, "Nagheenanajar"?)

This time, he has said, "Israel is a tyrannical regime based on evil..." Would you care to back that up, you wildebeast faced slimo? Your remarks are so out there they would be comfortable orbiting Jupiter. Let's look at this statement, shall we?

The definition of Tyranny, as quoted by Dictionary.com:

1. A government in which a single ruler is vested with absolute power.
2. The office, authority, or jurisdiction of an absolute ruler.
3. Absolute power, especially when exercised unjustly or cruelly: “I have sworn... eternal
hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man” (Thomas Jefferson).
4. Use of absolute power.
A. A tyrannical act.
B. Extreme harshness or severity; rigor.

In what way does Israel match any of these definitions? Hmmmm? (From YOUR point of view, it might be 4.B., due to how the world views the treatment of Palestinians. However, I would put down the plight of the Palestinians to the their leaders, who have squandered billions that could have turned Palestine into a paradise even nicer than Israel.)

So, Mr. Ahmadinejad, what say you? You go on, and on, and on, with rhetoric about how evil Israel is, how it should and will be destroyed, and how America will face more severe consequences if it continues to try and sanction Iran. Empty words. You have NOTHING to back ANY of this up, and you are simply saying what you wish to be true. You wish you had some reason to hate Israel and Jews other than, well, to be honest, I really don't know. I wish someone would tell ME why you hate the Jews so much.

Now lets look at evil: the most commonly used definition is:

"Morally bad or wrong; wicked: an evil tyrant. "

And what, exactly is so morally bad about Israel? Oh, you forgot to mention that? You forgot that in order to posit one thing, you needed some fact or instance with which to BASE it on? For instance,

"President Ahmadinejad is a tyrannical ruler for imposing harsh laws and sanctions on his own people, such as the ban on American music; President Ahmadinejad is evil because he forments hatred against innocent people and threatens their destruction; and President Ahmadinejad is morally wrong because his position is based the desire for power and control, which he would use for further evil purposes."

Now, THAT is how you take someone to task, you reprehensible imbecile.

One other topic I would like to touch on briefly: America's response.

I should say, America's NON-EXISTENT RESPONSE. Iran has been spouting rhetoric that attacks America's and the West's credibility, and no one even responds? I'm not saying we should censor him, though in fact that is what I'd like to see, but can't SOMEONE take a stand and say what this blog has? I would campaign for the first politician or well known person to do so.